|
|
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/15/2011 Posts: 87 Location: Houston
Rank:
(10736)
|
Sorry - this should be moved to My Movies Online Service / TV Series Data forum...
I know it doesn't actually change the way the titles are sorted, but something really bothers me about having naming standards that allow every person to follow different rules and have different entries for the same Title. The Sort attribute rules for complete TV Series are:
Friends 01: The Complete First Season or possibly Friends 01.00: The Complete First Season
Why the possibly? Half my TV Series have mixed entries, where some of the seasons are XXXXX 01: Season One, and the very next season is XXXXX 02.00: Season Two. The sorting still works, but is kind of awkward-looking across.
Why do we need the "possibly" in a naming standard? If the series is broken into volumes, great, that is covered in the very next rule:
volume Friends: Season One: Volume One Friends 01.01: Season One: Volume One
just like a boxed set as it should be.
This really causes confusion as well. for example, Caprica series was sold in Season 1 and Season 1.5. This is entered as Caprica 01.00 and Caprica 01.05? Where did the .05 come from? There isn't a volume 5? If we're going to use the 01.00 format, it needs to be used on all TV Series or only on those sold as volumes.
And some clarity on how to use it need to be given. Should Caprica Season 1.5 be entered as 01.50 or 01.02 (not 01.05 surely).
My recommendation is to follow the same Sort standard as Movie titles (NameXXXX 01: Season One) unless it is a volume (not so common). The additional .00 on all the sorts adds no value at all.
Thanks
|
|
Groups: Administration
, Member, Moderator
Joined: 10/20/2010 Posts: 635 Location: North Essex, England
Rank:
(180400)
|
bkripley wrote:Sorry - this should be moved to My Movies Online Service / TV Series Data forum...
I know it doesn't actually change the way the titles are sorted, but something really bothers me about having naming standards that allow every person to follow different rules and have different entries for the same Title. The Sort attribute rules for complete TV Series are:
Friends 01: The Complete First Season or possibly Friends 01.00: The Complete First Season
Why the possibly? Half my TV Series have mixed entries, where some of the seasons are XXXXX 01: Season One, and the very next season is XXXXX 02.00: Season Two. The sorting still works, but is kind of awkward-looking across.
Why do we need the "possibly" in a naming standard? If the series is broken into volumes, great, that is covered in the very next rule:
volume Friends: Season One: Volume One Friends 01.01: Season One: Volume One
just like a boxed set as it should be.
This really causes confusion as well. for example, Caprica series was sold in Season 1 and Season 1.5. This is entered as Caprica 01.00 and Caprica 01.05? Where did the .05 come from? There isn't a volume 5? If we're going to use the 01.00 format, it needs to be used on all TV Series or only on those sold as volumes.
And some clarity on how to use it need to be given. Should Caprica Season 1.5 be entered as 01.50 or 01.02 (not 01.05 surely).
My recommendation is to follow the same Sort standard as Movie titles (NameXXXX 01: Season One) unless it is a volume (not so common). The additional .00 on all the sorts adds no value at all.
Thanks
As a sort title they should all follow the "xxxx 01.00: " convention. Not all TV Series are sold as complete Season sets, take Doctor Who the original series for example each story is sold either individually in one keepcase or as a set of 2 or more stories. The New Doctor Who Series (Ecclestone,Tennant & Smith) can be brought in either 4 story DVD's or as complete season set's, Series 6 Smith's last aired was released as 2 sets containing 2 DVD's in each(Series 6: Part 1A & Part 1B & Series 6: Part 2A & Part 2B). So taking Doctor Who original series as an example how could you define say "Doctor Who: The Sensorites" as "Doctor Who 01.00: The Sensorites" and "Doctor Who: The Aztecs" as "Doctor Who 01.00: The Aztecs" and YES both stories come from Season 1. The only way to define them is by using the Season indicator and then the Episode indicator so therefore they actually become Doctor Who 01.27: The Aztecs Doctor Who 01.31: The Sensorites which keeps them in their correct aired order. Please bear in mind that with Doctor Who although a story is released on 1 DVD they are still in their original episodic format on the DVD hence why The Aztecs is 01.27 (4 episodes to the story) and The Sensorites is 01.31 (also 4 episodes to the story) some of the Doctor Who stories only had 2 episodes so the number sequence cannot be pre-defined. Hope this explains it a little bit. Steve
|
|
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/15/2011 Posts: 87 Location: Houston
Rank:
(10736)
|
Thanks for the reply Steve. I do understand that in some cases the 01.00 convention would be needed (for volume type releases as you've mentioned). But typically, TV Series are sold as a complete season and the "Title 01: Season One" format works perfectly. Even if you also have the same season in volumes, having a "Title 01.01: Episode Name" format will still sort correctly, with the entire Season first, and any individual episodes following. Of course, you can also use "Title 01.00: Season One" for the entire season if that is the decision.
I am quite happy if the naming standard is changed to 01.00 convention, my request was to make it one standard not whichever you desire as we end up with what we have now, a mixture of the two (and sometimes incorrect usage at that). Even on the same TV Series you can find one year using 01.00 and another using 02 only. Again, doesn't cause the sorting to break, just kind of ugly. If we change the Sort Naming for all TV Series to be one or the other, or at least only use the 01.00 for the broken volumes then we can start adhering to a single standard.
As the standard is written now, it is up to the contributor if they want to use "Weeds 01: Season One" or "Weeds 01.00: Season One"
For example, I have the first 8 seasons of Two and a Half Men; the Sort entries are: Two and a Half Men 01: The Complete First Season Two and a Half Men 02: The Complete Second Season Two and a Half Men 03: The Complete Third Season Two and a Half Men 04: The Complete Fourth Season Two and a Half Men 05.00: The Complete Fifth Season Two and a Half Men 06.00: The Complete Sixth Season Two and a Half Men 07.00: The Complete Seventh Season Two and a Half Men 08: The Complete Eighth Season
There is no value in having Seasons 5,6, and 7 in a different format than the other seasons, just messy.
My request is to make one standard for these and stick to it. Again, for a compete, unbroken Season I'd say use the 01 format; but equally happy with 01.00. As long as it is the same for all complete Seasons.
Does that make sense?
Brian
|
|
 Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 7/18/2007 Posts: 2,871 Location: Virginia
Rank:
(312585)
|
I think Steve explained it well enough. There are times when it's needed and times when not. Always doing "xx.00" would be best practice, but unless there is an actual problem with titles not sorting properly, we should not bother changing existing profiles.
My Movies Moderator
|
|
Groups: Member
Joined: 1/2/2008 Posts: 211
Rank:
(6939)
|
Steve's post seemed to be dealing with the episode whereas Brian was asking about the holding title. Agreed that the episodes should always follow s00e00 formats that are the public standard but the holding title does not need the extra .00. I fully agree with Brian that it is one of many frustrating 'messy' things that could, and should be clarified in the naming requirement instructions. It also helps to make the MyMovies look and feel more professional due to the extra level of consistency (vs. what you see here). I like to think of it like "if this was a commercial product (which this essentially this is), would this be an acceptable level of quality"? In this case, and many like it, it would not be acceptable and looks like an error/oversight. Doing the extra level of detail in guidance for this and other similar requests is important as it eliminates the disputes around formatting and other issues where users bother you guys with invalid data requests (or just fight updating it back and forth). I've long since shut off any updates from the Online DB after I enter my title due to many many many issues with people changing things due to preference where there was no guidance specified. I shouldn't have to as there isn't that many variables here. While the instructions may get a little longer than ideal, all rules to DB curation can be formalized so we 'free' laborers could be used more like a company would use their varied labor to deliver a very standardized product that doesn't appear to have been made by many disparate people.
|
|
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/15/2011 Posts: 87 Location: Houston
Rank:
(10736)
|
Thanks for the comments. Again, I completely understand when and where the 0x.00 format is needed and where it is not. As curtisb said, it is the inconsistency that irritates. All we would need to change is the current "standard" from:
Type Local Title Sort Title full season Friends: The Complete First Season Friends 01: The Complete First Season or possibly Friends 01.00: The Complete First Season volume Friends: Season One: Volume One Friends 01.01: Season One: Volume One
to
Type Local Title Sort Title full season Friends: The Complete First Season Friends 01: The Complete First Season volume Friends: Season One: Volume One Friends 01.01: Season One: Volume One
This provides for both cases, but removes the variability from the entries. If everyone likes having the extra .00 on full seasons (even though it adds no value in the case of full seasons), then I am happy to see the wording change to:
Type Local Title Sort Title full season Friends: The Complete First Season Friends 01.00: The Complete First Season volume Friends: Season One: Volume One Friends 01.01: Season One: Volume One
It's just having that "possibly" phrase that is causing the issue.
If we don't want to clean up the existing titles, then fine; but if we don't change the rules, we'll just continue to get more and more like the example I gave of Two and a Half Men where we have a mixture of both formats. Some will keep using the standard used for all other Discs (01:) as it works perfectly for all full seasons, and others will use the (01.00) on full seasons - and we all be following the rules as currently written.
I promise not to add to this thread unless asked a question now. :)
Appreciate all the input and hope this doesn't just die away.
|
|
Groups: Administration
, Member, Moderator
Joined: 10/20/2010 Posts: 635 Location: North Essex, England
Rank:
(180400)
|
curtisb wrote:Steve's post seemed to be dealing with the episode whereas Brian was asking about the holding title. Agreed that the episodes should always follow s00e00 formats that are the public standard but the holding title does not need the extra .00. I fully agree with Brian that it is one of many frustrating 'messy' things that could, and should be clarified in the naming requirement instructions. It also helps to make the MyMovies look and feel more professional due to the extra level of consistency (vs. what you see here). I like to think of it like "if this was a commercial product (which this essentially this is), would this be an acceptable level of quality"? In this case, and many like it, it would not be acceptable and looks like an error/oversight. Doing the extra level of detail in guidance for this and other similar requests is important as it eliminates the disputes around formatting and other issues where users bother you guys with invalid data requests (or just fight updating it back and forth). I've long since shut off any updates from the Online DB after I enter my title due to many many many issues with people changing things due to preference where there was no guidance specified. I shouldn't have to as there isn't that many variables here. While the instructions may get a little longer than ideal, all rules to DB curation can be formalized so we 'free' laborers could be used more like a company would use their varied labor to deliver a very standardized product that doesn't appear to have been made by many disparate people. No my post was NOT dealing with Episodes try looking up these EAN's 5014503261627 Doctor Who: The Keys of Marinus sort title Doctor Who 01.21: The Keys of Marinus 5014503109929 Doctor Who: The Aztecs sort title Doctor Who 01.27: The Aztecs 5051561033773 Doctor Who: The Sensorites sort title Doctor Who 01.31: The Sensorites All legitimate DVD's as sold by the BBC here in the UK. The Doctor Who Original Series as produced between 1963 and 1989 where never sold as complete Seasons they are the occasional Box Set whereby they put similar Stories together like the Bred For War Box Set which contains stories relating the Sontarians 5014503261726 Doctor Who: Bred for War which contains 5014503233426 Doctor Who: The Time Warrior sort title Doctor Who 11.01: The Time Warrior 5014503181123 Doctor Who: The Sontaran Experiment sort title Doctor Who 12.09: The Sontaran Experiment 5014503258627 Doctor Who: The Invasion of Time sort title Doctor Who 15.21: The Invasion of Time 5014503121327 Doctor Who: The Two Doctors sort title Doctor Who 22.07: The Two Doctors but even then despite the above titles having their own barcodes only one was available in the UK to be purchased outside of the Box Set as a stand alone DVD. So just because you think that the Doctor Who DVD's I was referring to where Episode, if you view the above EAN's you will find they are as sold DVD's. As far as doctor Who is concerned it's only the New Series (Ecclestone, Tennat & Smith) that can be purchased as Complete Season's, providing of course as a fan you haven't already purchased them as they are released during the season in which they are aired, when the BBC releases a Four Story DVD every few weeks during the airings and only at the end of the season do they also produce a Complete Season Box Set. As for complete Seasons whereby people have only put "xxxxx 01: The Complete" or whatever season number hasn't been made full length it isn't to hard to submit the ".00" yourselves to ensure all are uniform surely, if your that OCD by it? Steve
|
|
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/15/2011 Posts: 87 Location: Houston
Rank:
(10736)
|
Since a question was raised...
If we fix the standard, we won't need to continually request things to be unlocked, fix them, then have a moderator review and make the changes. A simple correction to the wording and it goes away. And then, someone who thinks it should be the other valid format ask for it all to be changed back again; and so on.
This thread has NEVER been about the Doctor Who scenario. Since those DVDs aren't complete seasons, they aren't the issue I am talking about.
I am talking about the Sort naming standard for Seasons of a TV Series only. I agreed from the first post that "broken" seasons, or volume should follow the standard already in place for them: volume Friends: Season One: Volume One Friends 01.01: Season One: Volume One
Perfectly fine standard, no ambiguity. The Doctor Who example you're using is not a complete season on a DVD, it is portions (volumes) of a Season and would fit under the already existing and very clear standard.
I am only talking about the standard as it is worded for a TV Series (complete season sold as one UPC/EAN). The standard for their Sort attribute is:
full season Friends: The Complete First Season Friends 01: The Complete First Season or possibly Friends 01.00: The Complete First Season
My only request is to not have the "possibly" in a standard. It allows every contributor to do whatever they want. It should be one or the other, not whichever everyone decides at the time. As it is, we end up with a mixture (see my previous, actual examples from the database now - Two and a Half Men).
I am not asking or wanting to touch anything to do with TV Series that are in volumes, or having separate parts of one season sold under different UPC/EANs.
I'm not OCD and not sure why improving on a good thing causes anyone to be upset - just wanting to make something better and more professional - for the good of all using this.
|
|
Groups: Administration
, Member, Moderator
Joined: 10/20/2010 Posts: 635 Location: North Essex, England
Rank:
(180400)
|
Then the answer is the same using the Doctor Who original series as an example.
So if when you are presented with 2 half seasons, have the first part as:- xxxxxxxx 01.00: yyyyyyyy xxxxxxxx 01.aa: wwwwww
Just replace the aa with the Episode number of where it would appear in the season so for arguments sake if the complete season is 20 episodes long and the first half season is episodes 1-10 and the second half is episodes 11-20
xxxxxxxx 01.00: yyyyyyy xxxxxxxx 01.11: wwwww
That way there is just system in place regardless of how the seasons are sold be it as complete or half seasons. That way there is consistency throughout MM regardless of how the DVD's are sold through out the World.
Heroes & BSG are another example of the same Episodes sold differently around the World. In the US you had BSG Season 4 & Season 4.5 here in the UK we had Season 4 & The Final Season.
But yes in answer to your original question it would be better to standardize the way they are dealt with and since there are different releases through out the globe as already pointed out the best solution would be the xx.zz, whereby xx pertains to the Season Number and zz pertains to the possible Episode Number so as to accommodate all possibilities.
Steve
|
|
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/16/2009 Posts: 87
Rank:
(5301)
|
lock the title on your data base and edit to what you want that fits your needs the best I found that the easiest to do since every TV series that I have is jacked one way or the other it boils down to everybody has their own idea on the numbering and first to post that series gets to chose the format for it Accept the TV series is a jacked mess and fix it on you own database will cause alot less stress to your self
Owner of NORTH COUNTRY SPECIALTIES http://www.ncspecialties.comMy Movie Collection http://c.mymovies.name/trentjwhttp://oc.mymovies.dk/trentjw
|
|
 Groups: Administration
, Member, Moderator
Joined: 11/2/2008 Posts: 4,489 Location: UK
Rank:
(756124)
|
wrong trent, sort guidelines apply and users are all expected to follow them on contribution, and ideally all users should contribute, it does not help the user or anyone to suggest people have varients locally as will end up biting them in the arse one way or another.
the rules are simple and consistant overall and if you follow them it will be fine.
My Movies Head Moderator
|
|
 Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 7/18/2007 Posts: 2,871 Location: Virginia
Rank:
(312585)
|
Trent, what you say is true to an extent. No matter what the guidelines state, it's difficult to get all the titles in line, as one person may not have all titles of a series and thus cannot see the bigger picture, or have not read or followed guidelines.
Overall users should stick with that is stated in guidelines, make sure everything looks correct and complete, and get the moderators to lock it. Then the number of issues should dwindle. There is typically no need to be doing something different than what guidelines say.
If there are times doing something in an undocumented way works better, then that is a case by case situation and the moderators have the final ruling on it.
My Movies Moderator
|
|
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/15/2011 Posts: 87 Location: Houston
Rank:
(10736)
|
Carl, I agree that following the rules should be the answer. The problem here is that the guidelines for Sort allow each person to decide what format they want as it has two "approved" formats. 01.00 and 00
Lostinva, you wrote that we need to follow the guidelines.. The problem is we are following them, but they allow for personal taste.
Friends 01: The Complete First Season or possibly Friends 01.00: The Complete First Season
Or Possibly implies you should use the format 01: XXXXX, but possibly you can use the 01.00 XXXXX format. It goes on to show examples where the 01.00 format should be used for seasons that are not complete. This is not a matter of people not understanding how to apply the standard, it is that there is variability in the way it is worded.
If the moderators feel we should always use the 01.00 format for TV Series DVDs, the just state that in the guidelines and the problem goes away over time.
I started this thread asking that we change the standard to have one numbering format only. If we don't, then the only way to keep your data clean is to lock your personal database as was suggested. I've actually had to do this on a couple occasions where one season of a TV Series used a different format from the others. When I submitted the request to change it as Incorrect Data following the process, the moderator told me the format was correct and so wouldn't change it. I explained in the request that the other season for the TV Series follow a different format.
Technically the moderator is correct, but that still leaves the Sort field inconsistent across the seasons in the same TV Series.
So we have some seasons following one "approved" format and others in the same Series following the other "approved" format and they are all locked down and can't be fixed. So, I fix them on my database and lock it.
If we just remove the 00 format from the TV Series Sort attribute, then over time they'll all be consistent. For those who don't care about consistent data, it shouldn't concern them one way or the other.
|
|
Groups: Administration
, Member, Moderator
Joined: 10/20/2010 Posts: 635 Location: North Essex, England
Rank:
(180400)
|
bkripley wrote:Carl, I agree that following the rules should be the answer. The problem here is that the guidelines for Sort allow each person to decide what format they want as it has two "approved" formats. 01.00 and 00
Lostinva, you wrote that we need to follow the guidelines.. The problem is we are following them, but they allow for personal taste.
Friends 01: The Complete First Season or possibly Friends 01.00: The Complete First Season
Or Possibly implies you should use the format 01: XXXXX, but possibly you can use the 01.00 XXXXX format. It goes on to show examples where the 01.00 format should be used for seasons that are not complete. This is not a matter of people not understanding how to apply the standard, it is that there is variability in the way it is worded.
If the moderators feel we should always use the 01.00 format for TV Series DVDs, the just state that in the guidelines and the problem goes away over time.
I started this thread asking that we change the standard to have one numbering format only. If we don't, then the only way to keep your data clean is to lock your personal database as was suggested. I've actually had to do this on a couple occasions where one season of a TV Series used a different format from the others. When I submitted the request to change it as Incorrect Data following the process, the moderator told me the format was correct and so wouldn't change it. I explained in the request that the other season for the TV Series follow a different format.
Technically the moderator is correct, but that still leaves the Sort field inconsistent across the seasons in the same TV Series.
So we have some seasons following one "approved" format and others in the same Series following the other "approved" format and they are all locked down and can't be fixed. So, I fix them on my database and lock it.
If we just remove the 00 format from the TV Series Sort attribute, then over time they'll all be consistent. For those who don't care about consistent data, it shouldn't concern them one way or the other. As I have already stated in my ALL TV Series should follow the the same convention that way if everybody submitted those that they own it wont take long for the WebService to be updated. As a sort title they should all follow the "xxxx 01.00: " convention. Where xxxx is the TV Series Title 01:00 is the Season indicator along with the .00 just incase the same TV Series is sold as Individual Episode as per UK Doctor Who (Original Series) or they are sold as half season sets or any other combination So following this convention your Friends: The Complete Season X would be Friends 01.00: The Complete Season 1 Friends 02.00: The Complete Season 2 Friends 03.00: The Complete Season 3 Friends 04.00: The Complete Season 4 Friends 05.00: The Complete Season 5 etc. Thus if locality Y sells them as half season sets you would get Friends 01.00: Season 1 Part 1 Friends 01.11: Season 1 Part 2 Friends 02.00: Season 2 Part 1 Friends 01.11: Season 2 Part 2 (this is assuming that the half season sets have 10 episodes per set) But by doing it this way everybody will be on the same page regardless of how they are able to purchase the Episodes, and there will be conformity across the WebService. Or is that too hard for user's to understand. Steve
|
|
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/15/2011 Posts: 87 Location: Houston
Rank:
(10736)
|
Agreed Steve. If the guidelines take out the optionality from the rule people will start using it and the moderators can enforce it accordingly. I'd happily change all the TV Series that I have and submit the updates. I don't think this would be too hard to understand (or is my opinion of the public at large too high?).
So, again - what's the process to change the guidelines? Anyone?
|
|
 Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 7/18/2007 Posts: 2,871 Location: Virginia
Rank:
(312585)
|
One can argue that that you should always do "xx.00" to cover all bases and I'd agree with that. But there is nothing to be gained by having the ".00" unless the series is known to follow a release format that actually necessitates it. That is why there are the two options. If a sort lacks a ".00" and that causes a problem with something showing out of order, then by all means correct it. Otherwise don't waste your time.
My Movies Moderator
|
|
 Groups: Administration
, Member, Moderator
Joined: 6/30/2010 Posts: 953
Rank:
(58713)
|
I'm relatively new getting into the TV sereis stuff and I have noticed the .00s arbitrarily appearing but as they don't change anything 01.00 is equivalent to 01 don't worry about it. I would go with the mod opinion of don't add the .00 unless its required by the type of release going back to the orginal Caprica example. The second set of numbers is for the episode leave it out or use .00 for a complete season, for partial seasons the episode number is the first in the box.
The two boxes for Caprica are Caprica: Season 1.0 and Caprica: Season 1.5
There are 9 episodes in the season 1.0 box I think so presumably the sorts would be:
Caprica 01.01: Season 1.0 Caprica 01.10: Season 1.5
|
|
 Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 7/18/2007 Posts: 2,871 Location: Virginia
Rank:
(312585)
|
Andy, it can make a difference if you happen to have a title sorted with "01:" and also have a sub set of some kind under the same season using "01.01:" format. The problem is caused by "." having a lower ASCII number than ":", which causes "01.01:" to appear before "01:" and isn't really desirable.
This is why I say if it is causing a problem, go ahead and fix it. Otherwise, it is not worth your time... as the potential number of these that would have to be modified as a result of a change in policy is quite high, and if there is no conflicts then it solves nothing.
My Movies Moderator
|
|
|
guest |