Hi all,
Our post on Windows Media Center being unavailable in Windows 10 where we recommend users of Windows Media Center to continue to use Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 have naturally caused a lot of feedback, and many saw it as a statement from our side that we were not open to looking at alternatives - we can assure you that this is not the case, and therefore we feel that it is time for a more in-dept topic for those interested in discussing alternatives.
In this topic, we would like to initially give our thoughts on alternatives for My Movies users in the long run, and then we would like your inputs.
Be aware that My Movies is much more than our Windows Media Center application - our server solution and mobile applications is used by thousands of users who never heard or even considered Windows Media Center an option for them. This topic however is not a discussion on the future of My Movies, but the future of the offering My Movies have on Windows Media Center - we know that for some of you, My Movies for Windows Media Center IS My Movies, but that is today not the case.
It is our belief that many of our users are not considering the limitations of the alternative requests that have been on the table, and those limitations are quite important.
We are naturally open to bringing alternatives - we just would like a solution where we can provide what we would like to provide.
Overall, many of the users of My Movies are using disc based media, and disc based media is still by far the easiest to handle automated, without the user having to spend several hours copying content in each week. Disc based media is along with lossless MKV files the ONLY playback option where you can retain full playback quality - it is our belief that our users are for the majority users who care about the quality, both about the quality of their meta-data, but just as much the quality of the media played. The solution we would like to provide is based on users having at least one primary zone in the house where you can rely on the full and not compromised quality of both video and audio - there can then be a number of alternative zones that serves content in a lower quality.
There is no doubt that many people see disc based media as a thing of yesterday - fact just is that the quality in relation to bitrates and audio quality that you can get on disc based media is unmatched by any streaming service, and unmatched by media converted to any other format than a lossless MKV. Blu-ray 4K is coming later this year, and while we do not have any knowledge about it, our hope is that it again puts some focus on quality - 4K is not just 4K, just like 1080P is not just 1080P - bitrates and audio tracks Counts a lot. It is naturally also not yet known weather Blu-ray 4K can even be backed up to storage, but this is another story.
This setup we believe that we cover today by letting users use original media, or alternatively, use our video converter to create lossless MKV files. The video converter can then be used to serve content to alternative zones that does not support these types of media - examples of that are ChromeCast devices playing converted MP4 files through our apps for iPhone, iPad or Android.
The above setup is something that we at least for our primary offer is not willing to compromise on.
Below, we would like to cover some considerations of alternative models to Windows Media Center we have had, and which limitations they face.
Windows Modern UI applicationIt has been considered to put some additional focus on our Windows 8.1 application, and this, or a new Windows Modern application appears to be a request made by many. The limitation here is that you are not free to do what we need in such application - it operates in a "Sandbox" that it cannot break out of.
The first and main concern is that we cannot launch other applications from this sandbox, and we therefore cannot launch external players such as PowerDVD, MPC or similar. This is from what we know still the case, and not something that is likely to change.
Any playback on such application is limited specifically to media that the modern Windows implementation supports - this currently does not even include lossless MKV files. The MKV files is said to be supported in Windows 10, but question is if it includes all stuff, including multiple audio tracks, and especially multiple subtitle tracks and selection of audio and subtitle tracks.
At the time our Windows 8.1 application was developed, we on top of that were not even allowed to access an external share without users manually browsing it through a network browsing dialog - it does not make sense to have to browse the network share on a NAS each time you want to play something. Without having checked in dept, we believe that this limitation likely is no longer there, and have been addressed.
This limits media playback on such application to a streaming model, where a file is served over a HTTP protocol, which our Windows 8.1 application already supports. Potentially, with Windows 10, it may become an option to play lossless MKVs without streaming, but still some unanswered questions on that.
Windows Desktop applicationThis is without a doubt what can bring us closest to what we have on Windows Media Center, and it is also the strongest topic in our considerations.
The concerns we have currently on this topic is that we have seen ArcSoft deprecate their TotalMedia Theatre product - we are unaware of the cause, but the way it was done indicates something that involved legal concerns or licensing concerns.
Our application on Windows Media Center supports both TMT and PowerDVD (yes, PowerDVD 15 coming soon), but with TMT the integration have been much nicer than it is with PowerDVD. On top of that, we had a good contact at ArcSoft, something we have never been able to get at Cyberlink, who appear to be much more closed in that relation.
If we are to develop a separate Windows Desktop application, it naturally includes a lot of development hours, and therefore a high cost - this we can handle, but it naturally requires that the cost can be earned back in over time, and without knowing the future of PowerDVD, including the unknown if Blu-ray 4K will be able to be backed up to storage, and if Windows based players will even be available for Blu-ray 4K, it adds a lot for us to consider.
Our take on a Windows Desktop application have so far also been that we see My Movies as a part of something bigger - My Movies focuses on movies, and as part of Windows Media Center, it was part of a full solution including tv, dvr, music, pictures and more. If we decide on doing a Windows Desktop application, it would continue to focus on just movies - we are not at all considering more than this - there are good alternatives to Windows Media Center on the market, such as XBMC, Media Portal, JRiver Media Center and others, and we see it much more likely for us to create add-ons to something else rather than starting developing something we for sure do not have resouces for, such as a full Media Center product.
Kodi/XBMC add-onMy Movies already stores NFO files for Kodi, our Android application have a remote control and remote launch option for Kodi, something which is natural to also consider for our iPhone & iPad applications. There are however several limitations to just storing NFO's for Kodi, including keeping track of watched, but also the fact that while we over Kodi's APIs can ask it to add titles added to the library, we cannot ask it to refresh a single title when you make changes in the data.
An actual add-on for application Kodi is something that naturally is in our considerations - we believe that Kodi is a great product, although we also believe that it over complicated for a daily use front-end interface, but that is another topic.
We have two main concerns for a Kodi add-on, the first being that many users run Kodi with another interface (skin) than the default one - we believe that following the look and feel of the environment we are in is of very high importance, and this can be very difficult to accomplish with an add-on for a skin-able interface.
The second concern we have is that these plug-ins are script based, and are likely to restrict us from doing what we need to do - this however is speculation, as we need to investigate this deeper. On Windows Media Center, we have a full .NET programming language behind it, and our limitations are related only to the parts Windows Media Center itself implements, and the user interface restrictions, but not to what we are able to do in the background.
Hardware Media PlayersToday, My Movies stores meta-data for several media players, and we have an unreleased interface for Dune players that we are also after Dune firmware changes going to finalize and make available.
However, the Dune players are hardware wise slow, and the interface we have unreleased is based on an HTML model in a slow browser - it is a great functionality for the users of Dune players, but a replacement of My Movies in Windows Media Center, it is not.
There are new players entering the market, one being Zappitis new 4K player, and developing an interface for one of these players are also a consideration.
Fact however is that no media players today have full disc playback and we are left to main movie playback on them.
Xbox OneAn application for Xbox One will have the same limitations as a Windows Modern UI application.
QuestionsWe hope that you guys follow the considerations above, and why we do not feel that the ideal alternative
Question 1The first question we have to you are in relation to disc based titles. Some users of disc based titles prefer these not only due to the quality, but also due to the extra material on the discs.
Is extra material important to you, or would a lossless main movie MKV file or individual TV Serie episode MKVs be enough for you, if you can be sure that the quality is the exact same as the original disc, including audio tracks, and forced subtitles appear as they should and similar?
Question 2The second question is weather you use My Movies for Windows Media Center with the purpose of movies alone, or if you use My Movies in Windows Media Center as it is part of the bigger picture with live tv, dvr, music and more.
In other words - would a separate My Movies application for Windows even be interesting for you, if focused entirely on what My Movies brings to Windows Media Center today?
Question 3The third question is if we are correct when saying that full quality playback is a requirement for our users?
Lossless, as in no loss of quality in both picture and audio means that copying content to MP4/M4V (H.264) files, which are supported by almost all environments is a no-go - no matter the quality settings, there are going to be a degrade of quality.
High quality video can be accomplished in converted video, either pre-converted like we do with our video converter, or on-the-fly converted which several other applications do, and question is if this is enough for you?
Is playback of non-lossless video, in as high quality as it gets an option for you, also in your primary playback zone?
Ending TopicHopefully, you find this topic a little more open to the future than the sound of our prior topic on the future of Windows Media Center - the aim of that topic was not to say that we would never move forward - the aim was to inform users of Windows Media Center of their options.
Let the discussions begin.
Best regards,
Brian Binnerup
My Movies
Having trouble installing or upgrading to My Movies 5? Click here for troubleshooting.Having a problem? Searching our Knowledge Base is always the first step.How can I produce a log file in My Movies for Windows?How can I fully uninstall My Movies for Windows